Part two of my costumes-in-sci-fi-and-Valerian rant
If you have read my earlier post “Limitless clothing choices and you pick that” you may have noticed I have
some opinions about clothing in scifi and was set off on this
instance by my viewing of Valerian. I promise you this post no my
earlier post contain spoilers for Valerian if you are still holding
out hope of seeing it. Nothing you won’t have seen in trailers or
posters anyway.
Last time, I looked at military uniform and the gender disparity which was at least 30yrs out of date and could have taken a lesson or two from Star Trek: The Next Generation’s somewhat sarcastic approach1.
Front Star TrekTNG season one. They didn't always wear leggings either. Sadly they ditched this in season 2. |
I also questioned how we approach the design of
alien clothing, being mindful of real world censorship without
enforcing Western morality on an alien culture. Valerian while not
the only perpetrator of such fallacies did prove itself to be almost
a step by step guide to the worst tropes.
This week I’m examining two more of those
tropes: female armour and a strange fascination with antique
clothing.
Do boobs give you extra hitpoints
I briefly hit upon the issues with female armour
in last weeks post and noted in the footnote that the issues of
“boobplate” and ridiculously gendered body armour are superbly
handled by BikiniArmorBattleDamage on tumblr. That still stands and I
urge you to check out their blog, look at the examples and read their
commentary for a far fuller picture. I don’t think I could really
let the armour choices in Valerian go by uncommented on, not when it
is such a blatant example of the trope and does so without any
apparent self awareness.
Before we go any further I should point out that
yes, there are far worse examples of female armour out there and yes,
I suppose we are ‘lucky’ that she has trousers. But I can’t
help but notice one major feature of the female armour design that
makes me think that the costume designer (or executive decision
maker) was thinking less about how armour works and more about the
old fallacy that sex sells2.
Boob plate: solid, separate cups that sit over the boobs leaving you
as to no doubt of the anatomy of the wearer. In contrast, male
identified characters get a breast plate, which may have some
definition over the pectorals but is rarely molded or as distinct as
that on female armour. The arguments for boob plate are that it
provides support and space for the breasts. The arguments against
boob plate largely come down to “that’s not how armour or boobs
work”.
In some contexts it may be appropriate for the
breast plate of a character with breasts to have distinct cups. If
there’s is a society in which bared breasts are a sign of strength
and virility, as for example a well sculpted male chest is often
treated, then having formed boob plate may be appropriate. If the
society is one in which women are seen as strong and revered, the
body is treated with respect and is neither over sexualised or
considered inferior, then again, moulded cups may be the preference of
some soldiers and may not stand out as odd. In our world, that’s
not the case, and in the world of many sci-fi films,including
Valerian, we aren’t given any context of that nature. Instead, the
moulded cups are merely there as a visual cue in case we forget which
one is female.
The costumes are form-fitting for all characters
that’s true, so some shaping is necessary for a good fit and
movement, especially if the material is rigid. But it’s this
rigidity that poses another argument against boob plate: if the
armour is curved steeply inward toward the body, as boob plate is
around the sternum, then a) you create a pressure point where those
hard edges and joins dig into the body, potentially harmfully and b)
you also create an angle that literally guides projectiles and other
hard items toward the body. That’s two things that armour
absolutely should not be doing.
I don’t expect fantasy and sci-fi armour to be
completely realistic plus many sci-fi franchises use lasers which
overcomes the directional problem which means we should be allowed
some artistic allowance and not be restrained by physics and material
science at all times. Additionally, actual real historic armour worn
into battle and in tournament was often heavily decorated with
elements that could prove to be dangerous to the wearer. The
difference though is that that decoration was very much a personal
preference and display of strength and personality3,4.
Boob plate is not, it is the repetition of a tired trope by a
production team. It isn’t a creative icon of a fantasy world, it is
the same old thing we have seen everywhere else and it serves very
little purpose.
The antique clothing fetish
This particular point is much more directly linked
to Valerian, though there are other films which fall foul, and it’s
how much of the clothing is not just inspired by, but directly taken
from human history. Valerian is set 500 years in the future and is
mostly set on “The City of a Thousand Planets”, a universe
spanning multicultural. We know that fashion is somewhat cyclic, that
magazines will tell us how “the 90s are back!” how similar
patterns of silhouettes repeat and for some, the 70s never really
ended. But for a citizen in The City ... to wear clothes not just
inspired by but lifted almost directly out of the 2000s would be like
people routinely wearing doublets and hose or stiff fronted gowns and
ruffs. Are we to suppose that in 500 years clothing hasn’t changed
at all, or does this film just happen to focus on a group of highly
dedicated reenactors who dress in costume at all times and are
considered a little odd?
People (well me at least) had high hopes for
Valerian with it coming from Luc Besson, writer of cult and
blockbuster classic Fifth Element. Fifth Element has aged
phenomenally well, key amongst its success the visual aesthetic and
the costuming provided by Jean-Paul Gaultier. Though the influences
are apparent, and any fans of Gaultier could clearly see his hand at
work, the costume created a society and culture that was different,
clearly influenced by the new and novel worlds and technologies of
the setting to say nothing of the creative entertainment and
celebrity industry. Valerian instead had Miami beachwear and faux
Victoriana. It was lackluster. Even without the dazzling highs of
Fifth Element to live up to it would have been markedly lacking in
creativity.
As I said at the start of my first post, costume
isn’t just about dressing your characters but about bringing to
life an entire culture and setting which we only get to see a limited
snapshot of. If your costume is recreations of vaudeville and your
average uni-campus but it’s set in space, what are we learning?
Well nothing much. The only conclusion I could draw from the Rhianna
showpiece as Bubbles, shape-shifting supposedly to match the desires of her
“client”, is that Valerian (the name of the main character from
which the film takes it’s name) has a deep and abiding fetish for
antique costume. Because if it’s odd that a film 500 years in the
future includes items that are common now in 2017, it is even more
bizarre that it would showcase and dress its characters in
facsimiles of Victorian showgirls, 18th Century gowns and 50s pinup.
It makes no sense either in the setting or for a sci-fi film: this isn’t Captain Janeway in her Victorian
holonovel, this is supposedly people living their everyday lives.
To put that little care and thought into the
creation of the world is evidence that too much attention was given
to exciting space battles and sweeping vistas and little, if any, was
given to the actual world that these characters inhabit and want to
save. And if the world is poorly developed then it is no surprise
that the characters are less than fully formed and floundering
through the plot.
Not only that but it’s a disservice to the
audience. It assumes that the only thing we would be content with or
accept are the same visuals that are trotted out time and again.
Additionally these are styles and visuals that are commonly linked to
sex work and titillation in the here and now - we haven’t lost our
fascination with the allure of a 50s pinup or Victorian brothel. Of
course if we really think about it we know that these are rose-tinted
images and that a myriad of social problems from misogyny to poverty
are intertwined with these vintage pastiches of sex. To tie them to
sex work in Valerian then is to divorce these pretty ideals even more
from their roots and to, as with the clothing of aliens, force some
very 21st century western morals on to what should be a far more
exotic and different place indeed.
To reiterate what I said at the start of the last post on this topic, costume actually matters in film and TV. It is one of the devises that should be used to tell us about the setting and society. When it is done well it can be seamless and we can be transported to another culture. When it is done badly it instead tells us about the culture of the producers and directors. Often instead of our sci-fi being exciting new realms of possibility, we are reminded that the film is just a part of the status quo, nothing new and exciting, just a sad reflection of the world we are already living in.
Valerian got it very wrong, though I doubt it will be the last to do so.
1Not
that TNG got costumes perfect or dealt with sexism particularly
well, but that was thirty years ago and I’d like to think we’d
moved on
2The
idea that sex sells is not as cut and dried an issue or a truism as
you may think
3It
has to be a very well crafted and clearly shown story for “it’s
the character’s choice to have armour like this.” an argument
which falls apart even more quickly once you consider this is a
military uniform,not personal clothing.
No comments:
Post a Comment